Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
Chinese Medical Journal ; (24): 1010-1014, 2011.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-239903

ABSTRACT

<p><b>BACKGROUND</b>Carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP) encompasses a heterogeneous group of tumors with varying clinical features. The management of patients of CUP remains a clinical challenge. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical applications of integrated (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) information in patients with CUP, including detecting the occult primary tumor and effecting on disease therapy.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>One hundred and forty-nine patients with histologically-proven metastases of CUP were included. For all patients, the conventional diagnostic work-up was unsuccessful in localizing the primary site. Whole-body PET/CT images were obtained approximately 60 minutes after intravenous injection of 350 - 425 MBq of (18)F-FDG.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>In 24.8% of patients, FDG PET/CT detected primary tumors that were not apparent after conventional workup. In this group of patients, the overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy rates of FDG PET/CT in detecting unknown primary tumors were 86.0%, 87.7%, and 87.2%, respectively. FDG PET/CT imaging also led to the detection of previously unrecognized metastases in 29.5% of patients. Forty-seven (31.5%, 47 of 149) patients underwent a change in therapeutic management.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>FDG PET/CT is a valuable tool in patients with CUP, because it assisted in detecting unknown primary tumors and previously unrecognized distant metastases, and optimized the management of these patients.</p>


Subject(s)
Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Carcinoma , Diagnostic Imaging , Pathology , Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 , Positron-Emission Tomography , Methods , Radiography , Reproducibility of Results
2.
Chinese Journal of Oncology ; (12): 306-309, 2008.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-348106

ABSTRACT

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To explore the diagnostic value of dual-time-point 18F-FDG PET-CT imaging in detecting hilar and mediastinal lymph node metastasis in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Forty-six patients with NSCLC underwent standard whole body single-time 18F-FDG PET-CT scans and a delayed imaging for the thorax alone before surgery, meanwhile, the standard uptake value (SUV) and retention index (RI) were calculated.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>A total number of 584 lymph nodes were excised in the 46 patients. Of these, 134 metastatic lymph nodes were pathologically confirmed in 31 patients. There were 189 lymph nodes detected and suspected to be metastatic by standard single-time 18 F-FDG PET-CT imaging, and 161 by dual-time-point imaging. Therefore, the sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value in the detection of hilar and mediastinal lymph node metastasis were 87.3%, 84.0%, 84.8%, 61.9% and 95.7% by standard single-time 18F-FDG PET-CT imaging, versus 94.8%, 92.2%, 92.8%, 78.9% and 98.1%, respectively, by dual-time-point imaging. There was a statistically significant difference in the detection of lymph node metastasis between the standard single-time imaging and dual-time-point 18F-FDG PET-CT imaging.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Dual-time-point 18F-FDG PET-CT imaging is more sensitive, specific and accurate than standard single-time 18F-FDG PET-CT imaging in the detection of hilar and mediastinal lymph node metastasis, and may provide more information for diagnosis, staging and treatment of non-small cell lung cancer.</p>


Subject(s)
Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung , Diagnostic Imaging , Pathology , False Negative Reactions , False Positive Reactions , Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 , Lung Neoplasms , Diagnostic Imaging , Pathology , Lymph Nodes , Diagnostic Imaging , Pathology , Lymphatic Metastasis , Diagnostic Imaging , Mediastinum , Pathology , Positron-Emission Tomography , Methods , Sensitivity and Specificity , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL